#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s.
#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s.
#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s. #39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s.
#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.008s. #21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s. #20 getting avg benchmarks for device 10227 +0s. #19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s. #18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s. #13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #12 getting avg benchmarks for device 6279 +0s. #11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.012s. #4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.052s. #3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17:26:21 +0200 +0s. While gaming, the card only uses as much power as the Radeon R9 285 which is more than 35% slower on average.ĬUDA, 3D Vision, PhysX, GeForce Experience, Surround, GameStream, GPU Boost 2.0, Adaptive Vertical Sync, G-SYNC, SLI The Maxwell architecture is very power efficient. The GM204 supports CUDA, 3D Vision, PhysX, GeForce Experience, Surround, GameStream, GPU Boost 2.0, Adaptive Vertical Sync / G-SYNC, SLI, DSR, MFAA and Virtual Reality latency improvements. The similar named mobile GeForce GTX 970M is clearly slower as it features only 1280 shader cores.ĭespite the unique memory configuration, the GTX 970 performs on average on par with the older GeForce GTX 780 Ti or a AMD Radeon R9 290X.
Benchmark test gpu gtx 970 vs gtx 750 full#
This can lead to some stuttering or reduced frame rates in games that use the full 4 GB.
Benchmark test gpu gtx 970 vs gtx 750 32 bit#
The graphics card is equipped with 4 GB GDDR5 (7 GHz effective). 3.5 GB of the 4 GB are connected with 224 Bit, the rest only with a 32 Bit interface. As the faster GTX 980, the GTX 970 uses the GM204 chip, but with reduced shaders (2048 vs.
The Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 is a high end desktop graphics card based on the Maxwell architecture. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ► remove from comparison
0 kommentar(er)
